John 6: 1-15
Do You Believe in Miracles?
A church mission committee once
hatched a plan to raise money for denominational mission work, and at the same
time teach the congregation something about world hunger. The congregants were
invited after church one Sunday to a fellowship meal—no cost, no potluck, lunch
was free.
The congregants dutifully
trooped into the fellowship hall after the morning worship service ended, where
18 tables, each seating 10 people, were already set up.
The mission committee hadn’t done
anything special with the set-up—plates, napkins, silverware sat at each place
setting, just like any other fellowship dinner. Salt and pepper, sugar and
sweetener and butter, all rested in their usual spots and a single plant sat on
the center of each table, each in a terra cotta clay pot.
What was different was that, even
though an indistinguishable mix of food smells made their way into the
fellowship hall, the kitchen doors were closed, and no food was in sight.
The mission committee invited
everyone to sit down wherever they pleased, and they would then receive further
instructions. So everyone sat down, chatting with one another about the morning
sermon, and wondering what the mission committee had cooked up for them.
Once everyone settled in, the
chair of the mission committee told the people at each table to look under
their potted plant for a number. Someone from each table looked, and sure
enough, they all found slips of paper with the number one, two, or three on them.
After the numbers were revealed, the
chair explained what would happen next. The people at the seven tables with
number two's assigned to them would send a representative to the kitchen for a
tuna casserole to serve among themselves, family-style.
The people at the 10 tables with a
number three would bring their plates to the kitchen window, where they would
each be served a small portion of plain white rice. Period.
And what about the one remaining
table? The table that had a number one? Well the people at this table were the
lucky ones. Their basic plates and flatware would be replaced with fine china
and real silver, and they would dine on steak, salad, twice-baked potatoes, and
a decadent chocolate dessert, served to them by members of the mission committee.
Oh, and they would get served first.
The congregation quickly figured out
the lesson here. The one lucky steak table represented the way affluent people
in the First
World ate,
while those at the tuna casserole tables ate the simple meals of the Second World.
The unlucky ones who ended up at the
number three tables ate like Third World poor people—if you can count consuming sticky bits of rice
as eating!
People talked and laughed uneasily
among themselves as they enjoyed—or tolerated—their meal.
But then, something happened that the
mission committee didn't expect. The people at one of the number two tables
noticed they had plenty of tuna casserole left over, even after everyone at
their table had been served.
They also noticed that one of the number
three tables had several small children sitting there who were looking more
than a bit confused at the rice on their plates, as though they were trying to
decide if they should complain, or just eat and be quiet.
Then a two-year-old started to cry.
One of the members of table two picked up the pan of tuna casserole and quietly
took it to the number three table with the crying child.
The room fell silent for a few
seconds. The chair of the mission committee started to protest, "Hey, wait
a minute! You're not . . ."
But sure enough, another table two
shared its food with another number three table. And another. And another. Soon
everyone was sharing their food with everyone else.
Even some of the people at the number
one table gave their slices of cake to the children at the other tables.
Everyone had enough to eat; no one went away hungry.
Now, I realize this was a
population that was hardly starving. Even those who had received only rice
could have easily gone home after the lunch and mission presentation and
supplemented their meager meal with the kind of food reserved for table number
one.
But what started as a lesson in
hunger became a lesson in sharing. You might call it a miracle. Certainly, if
this were to happen in "real life," it would be a miracle, indeed.
Today's New Testament scripture text
gives us a biblical miracle of sharing and abundance. Jesus and his disciples
are tired; they have been teaching, preaching, and healing all over Galilee, and they want food and rest.
Yet the crowd finds them, and the
crowd is hungry, first for the presence of Jesus and what love and teachings
Jesus can depart. Jesus is nearly depleted, yet he has compassion, and out of
his compassion comes the first miracle of the story, that of love and
endurance.
He continues to teach, going on for
so long that the disciples have to remind him that people have physical hunger
needs, too. The disciples note the people need to eat and Jesus in response
tells the disciples that he expects them to feed the gathered crowd.
Feed 5000 men, plus women and
children? With what?
A generous boy shows up with five
loaves and two fish. That amount might feed 10, depending on the size of the
loaves, but certainly not this crowd.
Jesus takes the food though, blesses it, breaks it and gives it to his
disciples.
Not unlike communion, come to think
of it. And then the disciples hand it out to the crowd, where five loaves and
two fish become enough food for everyone, with 12 baskets of leftovers,
besides.
Some scholars have given a rational
twist to this story. The real miracle, they say, is when the crowd sees the boy
give his provisions to Jesus, and sees Jesus bless the food and distribute it
freely, the crowd is moved to, each one, take out his or her own little store
of food and share it with others who didn't bring any, so that everyone has
enough to eat.
I certainly don't want to downplay
the very real miracle in this interpretation. Sharing when you only have a
little to share is a miracle enough, for it takes courage and trust to share
under such circumstances.
If I only had one loaf of bread, and
a long trek home, I might have good reason to horde that bread so I could
sustain myself on the journey back. It might take something extraordinary to
convince me to share that load with those sitting with me and trust God will
provide food for the trip home.
I do not believe, however, that
we should downplay, or deny, Jesus' miracles, or his ability to do them. I
suspect that more food did come out of hiding once the five loaves and two fish
started making the rounds.
And yet, Jesus is capable of taking
what little we have and multiplying it so that the little we share can serve
many. This miracle interpretation, to me, is not an either-or, but a both-and.
Not only that, people saw the miracle
that Jesus performed, and they believed in him. They saw him feed five thousand
people with only five loaves and two fish, and they recognized him for who and
what he was.
Jesus fed a whole hungry crowd with
one kid’s lunch! If I’d have been there, I’d have believed in him, too! But I
wasn’t. And I haven’t seen any really good miracles lately …how about you?
And oh, how this world needs
miracles. We too have hungry crowds that we don’t know what to do with. And
it’s not a few thousand people, but a few billion!
To be sure, we are compassionate
people, and it causes us pain, quite literally, to see the pictures and hear
the stories of starving children and adults … of dead children and
adults, in the Sudan, in the streets of Brazil, in North Korea, and even in our own country.
I mean, we’re Christians, right? We want to do something! But we’re not
sure what. A miracle would sure be nice. But I wonder if what we need these
days isn’t a different kind of miracle.
The feeding of the five thousand was
more than a simple act of feeding hungry people. It was also a kind of
"proof" to those people that Jesus was who and what he said he was.
And it seems to me that we must do the same sort of thing.
In feeding the hungry, we must
"prove," in a sense, that we are who we say we are. That we are
compassionate. That we are Christians. That we are followers of Jesus Christ,
who fed the hungry and had compassion on all who suffered.
And to be compassionate means more
than just feeling sorry. I am certain that the vast majority of people like you and I feel sorry
for those in need. After all, even the disciples felt sorry for the
5000 who were hungry.
Weren’t the disciples the ones who brought it to Jesus’ attention that
it was getting late?
Weren’t the disciples the ones who brought it to Jesus’ attention that
they were in a remote place?
Weren’t the disciples the ones who brought it to Jesus’ attention the
need for the people to go into town and get supper?
It wasn’t as if the disciples were heartless. I think we at
least have this in common with the disciples, we feel sorry for the less
fortunate, for the hungry.
But, it is not enough to just feel sorry. We are called to
follow not the disciples but Jesus. Jesus did not feel sorry for
the 5000. Jesus had compassion. Compassion is more than sorrow, it
is sorrow accompanied by an urge to help. And not just an urge – but actual
action.
But what can we do? Sometimes it
is all we can do to feed ourselves – how can we feed the world?
Well, first, we need to realize that
the problem of world hunger is not that there’s not enough land to grow
food on. At least, that’s not the problem yet. The problem is that the
food isn’t where the hungry people are! And that we can do something
about.
In many ways, all of them very
indirect, we keep food from going where it needs to go. Our national government
buys up excess grain from farmers, in order to help them out financially … But
too often, we dump the grain in silos and leave it to rot, rather than releasing
it onto the market and depressing prices.
Now I’m not arguing for or against
farm subsidies. I am saying that if we are going to spend all that money
– taxpayers’ money, your money and my money – that it ought not
to be wasted on rotting grain.
Coffee grown in Central America goes to feed our caffeine habits –
and the profits go to big business and the local farmers are left out in the
cold. Fishing off the coast of South America doesn’t go to feed hungry people
there – but comes north to be made into cat food for our cats. And it goes on and on.
Now I don’t mean to imply that America is entirely responsible for the
world’s hunger problems, or even hunger in this hemisphere. But we are partly
responsible.
And by that I mean us, not
just our government, not just all those other Americans out there
We are part of a long chain linked to poverty in our
world. And we are partly responsible for the mess we have helped to create. But
even more, we are responsible for doing what we can to get our world out
of this mess.
Now, I can see the little
wheels of cynicism starting to turn in some of your heads. Alleviate world
hunger? "That," you say, "would take a miracle."
Precisely. As a matter of fact, it
will take many miracles. Jesus fed five thousand, but you can bet there
were many other hungry that he didn’t get around to. He did what he could,
without becoming paralyzed by what he couldn’t. We must do the same: our
own small miracles in our own small way.
It has occurred to me that a
part of the miracle of this story is the response of the child who offered his
own lunch. It’s unlikely that he somehow "knew" that Jesus would turn
that into a meal for the whole crowd.
It’s even less likely that he thought
five loaves and two fish would make any dent in the hunger of that many people.
But he didn’t let that stop him from
offering what he had. He didn’t say to himself sadly, “I can’t make any
difference with my little contribution, so I’ll just keep my mouth shut.”
And he didn’t say, “this is mine
and I don’t have to share it … why didn’t everyone else come prepared like I
did?”
He gave what he could, and didn’t
worry about what he couldn’t. And Jesus took that gift, and did something
amazing with it.
This morning, after the
congregational meeting, we will have the chance to do something about world
hunger. After a very short DVD we will invite you to write letters to your
elected representatives. I hope you take
advantage of that opportunity.
But, I understand that this might not
be for you. If that is the case, then I
hope that you do something else. Write a
different kind of letter – letting our representatives know that hunger is an
issue we take seriously and so should they.
Or do something … else. Just don’t nod and do nothing.
By taking such steps, we are not only
helping the hungry in a small way. We are also showing the world who we are.
Compassionate. Faithful followers of our Lord, who went about doing good.
By this kind of miracle, not only
will hungry people be fed, but others will see our good works, and maybe even
join us. We can do miracles. Thanks be to God!
Amen.
|